Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Latest Threads
New Satellites launched.
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: Hollieath
2024-11-16, 08:06
» Replies: 2
» Views: 865
Cloud Dynamics and Lightn...
Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics
Last Post: gerbold
2024-11-14, 06:21
» Replies: 4
» Views: 3,066
Buying a station / kit. A...
Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics
Last Post: GrahamStr
2024-11-13, 17:31
» Replies: 6
» Views: 3,308
Differtent Forum Software
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: mwaters
2024-11-10, 19:09
» Replies: 6
» Views: 434
Buying a blue system
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: pnavoy
2024-10-27, 07:17
» Replies: 10
» Views: 12,419
Lightning block not showi...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: mwaters
2024-10-15, 18:55
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,249
Blitzortung doesn’t wor...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: Kets_One
2024-10-15, 15:00
» Replies: 1
» Views: 506
What Is The Best GPS Ante...
Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics
Last Post: Toxic
2024-10-14, 13:54
» Replies: 5
» Views: 3,344
I will buy SYSTEM GREEN!!...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: verdantsleep
2024-10-08, 01:43
» Replies: 3
» Views: 1,067
PCB red system production...
Forum: General Discussion
Last Post: meteolab
2024-10-03, 15:43
» Replies: 5
» Views: 1,538

 
  Different data on the maps
Posted by: Egon - 2015-02-20, 11:57 - Forum: General Discussion - Replies (7)

We currently make some experiments with a new computation schems. We will also change some internal data structures. I am sorry, but this is the reason that some maps already show the new computations, others show the old computations.

Please Do not care about the differences for a while, in a few days, everything will fit together. Please do not ask anything about the differences or changes now. If the system is running in a stable state, I am available to answer questions.

Egon

Print this item

  lightningmaps.org problem??
Posted by: orion_jb2001 - 2015-02-18, 20:10 - Forum: General Discussion - Replies (8)

Hi,

anyone else noticing a problem with lightningmaps .org at the moment?? Does seem to be tracking strikes.


Jeff

Print this item

  accessing web page interface
Posted by: Jim Mandaville - 2015-02-18, 15:09 - Forum: General Discussion - Replies (3)

I'm operating a new station with everything apparently going okay. Could someone please explain how to access one's web interface? My browser is Mac Safari. I find the IP on the LCD of my controller. Do I use the first line of the IP only? Do I need to use the subnet mask and gateway, also? So far, using the first line of the IP found on the LCD I am not reaching the web interface. Does one have to enter this while inside blitzortung.org someplace? So far I am just trying to use my Mac Safari browser. Any guidance appreciated.

Jim Mandaville[/align]

Print this item

  Newbie Questions
Posted by: chubros - 2015-02-18, 06:14 - Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics - Replies (3)

Hello to everyone. I just completed my red h-field kit and i had some questions.

1) I had 2 ferrite rod 200mm antennas. Should i cut their cables and solder them to new thickest ones??

2)Do i need any special settings in the controller? I have it in automatic mode.

Thanks in advance..

Print this item

  how accurate is this ntp
Posted by: hans - 2015-02-17, 21:24 - Forum: General Discussion - Replies (11)

i believe very accurate or let's say extremely precise.
otherwise the calculation for the location of the lightning strokes could not be done.

of course i switched on the NTP server functionality. as with every watch one wants have it running very exactly. even if it is in a way of precision i never can use it. i configured my solaris server to use my system red as stratum 1. additional i configured 2 stratum 1 server near my location in vienna with "noselect". as i know from the past it is always bad if delay and especially jitter is high. and one additional from the location where the time is made ( braunschweig :-) also with "noselect". i also have a DCF77 which has per definition a big systemic error. i adjusted this with the "fudge" statement to be _near_ the GPS signal. when i look i have most of the time a situation like this:

PHP Code:
# ntpq -pn
     
remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
==============================================================================
+
192.168.241.93  .DCFa.           1 u   62 1024  377    0.743   -0.706   4.345
*192.168.241.190 .GPS.            1 u  365 1024  377    0.917   -0.001   0.139
 192.53.103.108  
.PTB.            1 u  418 1024  377   46.284   -8.819   0.673
 178.189.127.147 
.ATOM.           1 u  996 1024  377   21.794   -5.281   0.512
 131.130.251.107 
.PPS.            1 u  205 1024  377   18.983   -6.134  12.341 

my server takes the time from system red (*192.168.241.190) and has a typically offset between 6 and 8 ms against the others stratum 1. that means that system red is in average 7 ms in the future against the others. unfortunately the "fudge" statement works only for reference clocks and not for the system red i configured in my server which is stratum 2.

i don't know how many of you are using system red as ntp server. any feedback about experience from you about this topic is welcome.

maybe the future brings a possibility to enter an offset for the ntp server functionality. but i know it's not the primary function of this system.

finally i want to say thank you to Egon and others for this great project.

kind regards
hans

--

Print this item

  Wintergewitter
Posted by: Flacoon - 2015-02-17, 10:52 - Forum: Non-English - No Replies

Hallo Leute,
bin neu hier und eigentlich auf der Suche nach Jemanden, der mir Auskunft über Wintergewitter im Zeitraum Dezember 2014 Raum 84079 Landshut geben kann?
Würde mich über Hilfe freuen

Print this item

  bandwidth hog
Posted by: jrm30655 - 2015-02-14, 17:02 - Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics - Replies (1)

My controller has suddenly become a bandwidth hog, especially on the upload side.

I've also noticed that the server is not seeing strokes but the map is showing the station is logging strikes. When I click on the red dot on the left, it shows that the station is not active. However, when I actually look at the controller directly, it is working great.

Anyone else having this problem?

Station 1218

Print this item

  Schematic help
Posted by: Lawrence Stoskopf - 2015-02-13, 04:44 - Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics - Replies (7)

I've completed RED system boards received a week ago. Loaded the software and got an OK from the programmer (after updating the ST firmware). All of the LEDs are appropriate and the Ethernet controller flashes appropriately. But screen is dark. Checking the module supply voltage on pin 2 gives me about 2.3 volts. On pin 3 sort of varies, but positive rather than the expected negative. I do have 5 volts on the back lite supply pin17. These measurements with or without the module DIP122-5NLED installed.

This is PCB10 ver4 11/2013. The pdf instructions Figure 43 with the schematic (for ver3) is blank. I can probably follow traces and do a schematic, but pin 2 doesn't seem to have a trace to my eyes and it would be a lot easier with a schematic.

Anyone help? Thanks,

Print this item

  Theory.. ??
Posted by: orion_jb2001 - 2015-02-08, 19:51 - Forum: General Discussion - Replies (2)

Hi all,

I am just watching (nearly 20.00 UTC Sunday) local commercial weather site (Weatherzone) some monsoonal activity in northern Australia. PNG and Indonesia, with their site indicting some lightning activity but no hits in the Blitz system for any Oceania stations, why??

Jeff

Print this item

  programming procedure
Posted by: Jim Mandaville - 2015-02-08, 16:59 - Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics - Replies (1)

I'm a newby here with completed hardware that seems to check out all right.

Does the first step in programming (after obtaining a user account) involve downloading the firmware from the Blitzortung "service" area? If so, where should this best be placed in one's computer? Does entering it later as a "program" require its location info (in the form of file links? Or can one just use the name Firmware.bin?

I plan to use the STM32 link utility.

Any guidance appreciated.

Jim

Print this item