2017-11-03, 01:45
(2017-10-30, 22:44)Cutty Wrote:(2017-10-30, 21:06)allsorts Wrote:(2017-10-26, 21:03)Egon Wrote: I would like to change the measure for the efficiency of the stations.
I quite like Cutty's:
Efficiency = Strokes Detected / Signals Sent
Effectivity = Strokes Detected / Signals Sent - Strokes Detected
Being based purely on the numbers from a given station it removes the influence of the total region count which generally has the affect of pushing a station that sends few but high quality signals down the list.
Not sure how to combine those with a distance. "signals sent" doesn't have any distance information but does that matter? I don't think it does.
Actually, it does... in a 'thought experiment'...
Hmm, whilst I agree that a stations enviroment and location affect the settings (threshold/gain etc) of that station my gut feeling about the above formula is that distance "cancels out".
ARGH! I hate web based editors that drop your carefully crafted message in the bit bucket if you accidentaly load another page in the same tab/window. I'd typed in a load of thought experiment showing that distance doesn't come into the formulas. It also showed that gain governed range and that threshold is best set after the gain/range value to the point where local noise only rarely triggers a signal. Note this was a thought experiment in a nice friendly world not the hostile, real, one. Finding a setting for the threshold with variable local noise levels might be tricky.
The range a station is optimised for is a choice for the operator but for most benefit to the network ought to follow that relatively isolated stations go for range and ones with nearby neighbours restrict their range.