Yes, thats correct !
But without the "denominator", poor performing station will be pushed up, if they sending a lot of signals (and maybe a few more strokes). Thats not good for the network.
![[Image: efficiency_l.png]](http://www.sternhimmel-ueber-ulm.de/blitz/efficiency_l.png)
![[Image: efficiency.png]](http://www.sternhimmel-ueber-ulm.de/blitz/efficiency.png)
You see the difference ? I find the red graphic fair. It doesn't denominate good performing station, but suppresses heavy signal-jammer. And it also shows good performing stations with less signals at the right side in the graph, not only on the left side.
Thomas
But without the "denominator", poor performing station will be pushed up, if they sending a lot of signals (and maybe a few more strokes). Thats not good for the network.
You see the difference ? I find the red graphic fair. It doesn't denominate good performing station, but suppresses heavy signal-jammer. And it also shows good performing stations with less signals at the right side in the graph, not only on the left side.
Thomas