![]() |
|
New member, having some problems with H-field big interference bursts.. - Printable Version +- Blitzortung.org Forum (https://forum.blitzortung.org/mybb) +-- Forum: Public Forums (https://forum.blitzortung.org/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=29) +--- Forum: Hardware, Software, Lightning Physics (https://forum.blitzortung.org/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=30) +--- Thread: New member, having some problems with H-field big interference bursts.. (/showthread.php?tid=2722) |
New member, having some problems with H-field big interference bursts.. - michidragon - 2018-09-14 So I noticed some threads about interference on Blue were moved to forums I can't access, so I hope i'm not doing this wrong. (I tried to navigate from the Member area to the forum to link my account as a Participant but it doesn't seem to have worked... Tried a few times..) I got my Blue board finished yesterday (with the LTC filter chips on each channel, and so far two ferrite rods at 90 degrees horizontal; and the amplifier attached tot he H-field port via about 1m of Cat5e cable.) Results have not been so good. The unit has been going into Interference Mode (Burst) quite quite often and the stroke level compared to the station mean is very low. (My station is 2284, by the way.) I did un-knot the knots on the ferrite rod leads, because I was worried this may somehow mess with the signal (I know now that that's unlikely to be the case and was probably a bad idea as it weakened the wire; at least the ferrite rods are not too rare right now) - but I did connect the knotted leads to + on channels A and B. I did NOT solder the jumper pads on channels A and B on the back of the H-field amp as I interpreted this as needing to be done for loop antennas only. I don't know if I read this wrong. Anyhow, performance has not been good. In automatic mode the system would just go into burst interference mode quite a bit. In Manual, with default settings, less so, but I presume this isn't ideal in terms of gain being adjusted. I've tried to figure out what's causing the interference. At first I was worried that I soldered on one of the filter chips wrong (The orientation is correct, i'm sure of, but maybe there was a bridge or I heated one of the chips too much - ) but for sure the interference signal stops the second I disconnect the H-field antenna. (I do not currently have E-field set up but I will shortly.) Anyhow, it seems that if I have the H-field antenna a certain level low to the ground, the burst mode interference begins; if I elevate it too much, the burst mode interference begins as well. For now I have it at a 'medium point' where it doesn't seem to detect this interference, (which honestly is about 5 feet off the ground) - but it seems that detection is very low. Is there anything obvious here I'm doing wrong? If the ferrite rod leads come close to eachother in my (pvc pipe) H-field frame, is that going to cause a problem? Did I need to solder the jumper pads? Is the knot anything more than an indicator? Sorry for all the questions, I spent a very long time waiting to become part of the Blitzortung project so I am very motivated to get my station working well... just of course there is going to be a learning curve here. Thanks, Michi RE: New member, having some problems with H-field big interference bursts.. - cutty - 2018-09-14 Here are some thoughts... First, put the station in Manual Mode..,. Automatic will drive the gains up and down, and you can cycle in and out of interference. Make Sure your antennas and amp are NOT near noise sources.... Make sure you have a good power supplly... then... With total manual… turn off the optional filters. set gains to 10*10 H field, and 4*2 E field…\\ set thresholds at 100mv… With NO signals present, check your noise levels… average.. touch up the gains so they're somewhere around 20-40mv… as close to 20 as possible perhaps… 40 is borderline. We've two types of junk we're looking at… “always there”, and “Sporadic”… Now, the “always” adjust thresholds first, then / or gain for that channel so that the 'always' noise DOES NOT trigger a signal…and apply / save. Try to accommodate gains so that you can keep the standard threshold at 100MV if possible. You may then adjust it later on a specific channel… Now your 'ambient' always present sources shouldn't trigger anything… Call this Baseline #1 Then… Ideally, you want to operate so that the WORST sporadic interference doesn't trigger a signal. You're still in absolute manual, withf the optional filters off. That should put you into 'ambient' operation Baseline #2… while doing this, keep your threshold at least twice what the ambient 'noise grass' (no signal) level may be. If you have an obvious noise source at , say 150kHZ, you could adjust the optional filter to cut off at about 130-140 kHz… you'd monitor each channel, for a period of time, diurnally, weekends, etc… and gradually fine tune these settings…. Now, what you determine this week, may change in July… or November… simply because the total environment changes… You WILL have junk, or nearby cells, that may at times create too many signals, or activate a temporary 'interference' situation.. the system is designed to do that… if they're temporary, great… accept it, and move on… leave stuff alone… Junk signals are ok… the server knows the difference… even if Impulse triggers, and the noise is sent… you just don't want Noise controlling your system… remember “lightning does the work”… You may no longer detect signals in California… so what??? We've other stations to do that… it's the 'NETWORK' doing what it's supposed to do…there's no 'competition' between stations… or shouldn't be… heh… every environment is different, at different times, and scenarios. Later on, you might experiment with Automatics… but you're going to be chasing ghosts if you operate that way while establishing you ambient operating baselines,… wasting your time, and peace of mind. Over the years I've experimented with the autos… and determined that in my environment they are basically worthless for consistent operation…. that is NOT true for many stations, but you may very well be a member of the “Cutty Sark Sailor Manual Mode Mob”… RE: New member, having some problems with H-field big interference bursts.. - gerbold - 2018-09-14 (2018-09-14, 04:10)Michidragon Wrote: So I noticed some threads about interference on Blue were moved to forums I can't access, so I hope i'm not doing this wrong. (I tried to navigate from the Member area to the forum to link my account as a Participant but it doesn't seem to have worked... Tried a few times..)You can find a description on how to setup the account here: https://docs.lightningmaps.org/doku.php?id=en:hardware:blue:operation:account&s[]=account It is too long ago that I did it, thus I'm not 100% sure this description is ok. If not I'd love to get a working description in order to update the wiki. Quote:I got my Blue board finished yesterday (with the LTC filter chips on each channel, and so far two ferrite rods at 90 degrees horizontal; and the amplifier attached tot he H-field port via about 1m of Cat5e cable.)Congratulations. Your station did send some data according to LMO. Quote:Results have not been so good. The unit has been going into Interference Mode (Burst) quite quite often and the stroke level compared to the station mean is very low. (My station is 2284, by the way.)Nothing to worry about when powering up for the first time. The good message is: it works! Quote:I did un-knot the knots on the ferrite rod leads, because I was worried this may somehow mess with the signal (I know now that that's unlikely to be the case and was probably a bad idea as it weakened the wire; at least the ferrite rods are not too rare right now) - but I did connect the knotted leads to + on channels A and B.Removing the knots is not required, they will not mess with the signal. Whether the knot is connected to + or - is not relevant for the detection of lightnings. The time of the signal is relevant for Blitzortung. If you have the knots at + you can detect the direction in which a stroke happened based on the phase of the signals. Cutty has a post descriging this. I'm too lazy to search this right now. Quote:I did NOT solder the jumper pads on channels A and B on the back of the H-field amp as I interpreted this as needing to be done for loop antennas only. I don't know if I read this wrong.This is correct. No need to solder these jumpers on the H-field pre-amplifier for ferrite rods, no need to solder it with loop antennas using transformers. The only case in which it has to be soldered is for loop antennas without transformers. Quote:Anyhow, performance has not been good. In automatic mode the system would just go into burst interference mode quite a bit. In Manual, with default settings, less so, but I presume this isn't ideal in terms of gain being adjusted.Try following this guide: https://docs.lightningmaps.org/doku.php?id=en:support:faq#how_to_configure_for_the_very_first_time Quote:(I do not currently have E-field set up but I will shortly.)No need to. You can participate with or without. It is up to you. Quote:Anyhow, it seems that if I have the H-field antenna a certain level low to the ground, the burst mode interference begins; if I elevate it too much, the burst mode interference begins as well. For now I have it at a 'medium point' where it doesn't seem to detect this interference, (which honestly is about 5 feet off the ground) - but it seems that detection is very low.Is your antenna close to PCs, Monitors, power supplies, any other source of electromagnetic noise? Try to get it as far away from such sources as possible. Others have been proposing mounting the antenna onto a camera tripod (I hope to remember the correct naming) and to move the antenna to find the sweet spot. According to some postes it can take weeks. to find a good place. Quote:Is there anything obvious here I'm doing wrong? If the ferrite rod leads come close to eachother in my (pvc pipe) H-field frame, is that going to cause a problem? Did I need to solder the jumper pads? Is the knot anything more than an indicator?Doesn't look like there is anything obvious wrong. Your questions are welcome. Klaus RE: New member, having some problems with H-field big interference bursts.. - michidragon - 2018-09-14 Well, followed the account link procedure to the letter; Logging in on blitzortung.org, going to "Further Info" then "Forum". Still no go... i'm still a non-participating user; Wondering if it's something obvious: Was I not supposed to create a separate forum account? Because I did do that... I created a forum account, and a Blitzortung.org account via my System Blue and the registration email. Both logins are the same -- maybe that's the trouble? Odd, I hope somehow I can get that fixed. Anyways all of this information has been reassuring and is a good lead for perfecting it all more... A little bit of a new concern though... On last startup, GPS was red on the interface and it said "No valid 1PPS pulse." Log looks like: 2018-09-14 07:37:23 141.3 | GPS: 1PPS deviation too high 77346010. Reset counter! 2018-09-14 07:37:25 143.3 | GPS: 1PPS deviation too high 77342354. Reset counter! 2018-09-14 07:37:26 144.3 | AMP1: Set gain 1 on channel 0, op-amp 0 2018-09-14 07:37:27 145.2 | GPS: 1PPS deviation too high 77388722. Reset counter! 2018-09-14 07:37:29 147.1 | GPS: 1PPS deviation too high 77465666. Reset counter! 2018-09-14 07:37:31 149.0 | GPS: 1PPS deviation too high 77456824. Reset counter! 2018-09-14 07:37:33 150.9 | GPS: 1PPS deviation too high 77393702. Reset counter! 2018-09-14 07:37:35 152.9 | GPS: 1PPS deviation too high 77461252. Reset counter! 2018-09-14 07:37:36 153.9 | AMP1: Set gain 2 on channel 0, op-amp 0 2018-09-14 07:37:37 154.8 | GPS: 1PPS deviation too high 77528044. Reset counter! 2018-09-14 07:37:39 156.7 | GPS: 1PPS deviation too high 77394802. Reset counter! 2018-09-14 07:37:41 158.6 | GPS: 1PPS deviation too high 77438594. Reset counter! After quite a while, the 1PPS pulse got within range and everything is back up and running now; but looking at other posts in the forum about this issue (Admittedly on System Red) - it seems this could be a bad sign for the u-blox GPS chip? Anyways, I hope that's not the case. I certainly am going to work on finding a good location for the antenna before winter sets in here! So it certainly may just be an issue of finding the sweet spot. -Michi RE: New member, having some problems with H-field big interference bursts.. - michidragon - 2018-09-14 (2018-09-14, 05:50)Cutty Wrote: Here are some thoughts... Cutty, thanks for all this. It gives me a lot to look at and experiment with this weekend. I definitely want to tune this setup procedurally so that's actually just what I was looking for. Hopefully this new GPS weirdness isn't a sign of things to come on that component; I'll get the feel for this yet! Thanks, -Michi RE: New member, having some problems with H-field big interference bursts.. - dupreezd - 2018-09-14 Michidragon, the way you specified your antennas on your BO station setup in not correct. Input 0 - 2 is for the H-Field. Leave Input 2 as "undefined" as you only have 2 ferrites. Input 3 is for the E-Field. RE: New member, having some problems with H-field big interference bursts.. - michidragon - 2018-09-15 (2018-09-14, 11:46)dupreezd Wrote: Michidragon, the way you specified your antennas on your BO station setup in not correct. Input 0 - 2 is for the H-Field. Leave Input 2 as "undefined" as you only have 2 ferrites. Got it. changing it now.... EDIT: Done, let me know if that is correct? I have 0,1 = H-field, 2 set 'undefined' (for when/if I add a 3rd H-field) and now 3 is E-field. (I added the E-Field to my station last night.) RE: New member, having some problems with H-field big interference bursts.. - dupreezd - 2018-09-15 (2018-09-15, 18:13)Michidragon Wrote:(2018-09-14, 11:46)dupreezd Wrote: Michidragon, the way you specified your antennas on your BO station setup in not correct. Input 0 - 2 is for the H-Field. Leave Input 2 as "undefined" as you only have 2 ferrites. Yes, it is correct now, but is your E-Field really 3000mm (3m) long. It should only be 100mm Now follow Cutty setup instructions.
RE: New member, having some problems with H-field big interference bursts.. - michidragon - 2018-09-15 (2018-09-15, 18:31)dupreezd Wrote:(2018-09-15, 18:13)Michidragon Wrote:(2018-09-14, 11:46)dupreezd Wrote: Michidragon, the way you specified your antennas on your BO station setup in not correct. Input 0 - 2 is for the H-Field. Leave Input 2 as "undefined" as you only have 2 ferrites. Whoops, no its 300mm/30cm. (Too long? Trimming that is sure easy enough.. I read that 10cm was a minimum, made it 30cm to make it easier to mount the PVC housing I put it in, to my mast. That said it can surely just be 10cm and sit in the same housing.) RE: New member, having some problems with H-field big interference bursts.. - dupreezd - 2018-09-15 (2018-09-15, 19:22)Michidragon Wrote:(2018-09-15, 18:31)dupreezd Wrote:(2018-09-15, 18:13)Michidragon Wrote:(2018-09-14, 11:46)dupreezd Wrote: Michidragon, the way you specified your antennas on your BO station setup in not correct. Input 0 - 2 is for the H-Field. Leave Input 2 as "undefined" as you only have 2 ferrites. I had a look at your station signals and it looks great!! Good job. Edit: sorry looked at the wrong station. |